Difference between revisions of "TCT Meeting/October 2013 Minutes"
From Xen
Lars.kurth (talk | contribs) (Added boilerplate) |
Lars.kurth (talk | contribs) m (→Attendees) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| content1 = [[Xen Technical Coordination Team (TCT) Meeting|Home]] |
| content1 = [[Xen Technical Coordination Team (TCT) Meeting|Home]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
| + | |||
| + | = Attendees = |
||
| + | * Ian Campbell |
||
| + | * Matt Wilson |
||
| + | * Jan Beulich |
||
| + | * Boris Ostrovsky |
||
| + | * Ravi Suravee |
||
| + | * Daniel De Graaf |
||
| + | * Anthony Liguori |
||
| + | |||
| + | = Review ACTION items. = |
||
| + | * Recurring need for pings on VMX/SVM/IOMMU patches |
||
| + | ** {{Action|Jun}} to figure out the focal point. {{Tick}} Will Auld |
||
| + | * xend |
||
| + | ** {{Action|Matt & Konrad}} to reply to the 4.4 planning thread with their BLOCKERS. {{NotDone}} (Konrad: absent) |
||
| + | *** For Matt's, list discussion about SXP -- better to change the higher level stack. Matt will post this to xen-devel |
||
| + | ** {{Action|Ian}} to write patch to warn when xm is used {{Tick}} |
||
| + | |||
| + | = Current technical challenges. = |
||
| + | |||
| + | * PVH next steps |
||
| + | ** Right people not on this call |
||
| + | ** Ian suggested to George to have a separate call |
||
| + | ** Jan would like to be invited |
||
| + | |||
| + | = Coordination on current and future work = |
||
| + | |||
| + | * Konrad absent. All delayed to next time. |
||
| + | ** Proposals for interships program for summer or winter in Xen ecosystem. (Konrad) {{Tick}} see [[AB_Votes/Outreach_Program_For_Women_Round_7]] |
||
| + | ** SR-IOV, PCI passthrough and all that fun. (Konrad) |
||
| + | ** SR-IOV, PCI passthrough gaps. (Konrad) |
||
| + | |||
| + | * Boris. How much testing did we have for NMI injection into PV domains. |
||
| + | ** Jan, only recently implemented in pvops, but has worked for a long time in classis/SuSE kernel |
||
| + | ** Works for internal self NMI |
||
| + | ** Only dom0 might receive a real hardware NMI forwarded |
||
| + | ** Jan: Not a lot of testing of a high rate NMI (e.g. performance monitoring). Currently NMI is a rare event like a machine check. |
||
[[Category:Technical Coordination Team]] |
[[Category:Technical Coordination Team]] |
||
Latest revision as of 15:46, 4 November 2013
| Home |
Contents
Attendees
- Ian Campbell
- Matt Wilson
- Jan Beulich
- Boris Ostrovsky
- Ravi Suravee
- Daniel De Graaf
- Anthony Liguori
Review ACTION items.
- Recurring need for pings on VMX/SVM/IOMMU patches
Action Jun: to figure out the focal point. ✓ Will Auld
- xend
- Action Matt & Konrad: to reply to the 4.4 planning thread with their BLOCKERS. ✗ (Konrad: absent)
- For Matt's, list discussion about SXP -- better to change the higher level stack. Matt will post this to xen-devel
- Action Ian: to write patch to warn when xm is used ✓
Current technical challenges.
- PVH next steps
- Right people not on this call
- Ian suggested to George to have a separate call
- Jan would like to be invited
Coordination on current and future work
- Konrad absent. All delayed to next time.
- Proposals for interships program for summer or winter in Xen ecosystem. (Konrad) ✓ see AB_Votes/Outreach_Program_For_Women_Round_7
- SR-IOV, PCI passthrough and all that fun. (Konrad)
- SR-IOV, PCI passthrough gaps. (Konrad)
- Boris. How much testing did we have for NMI injection into PV domains.
- Jan, only recently implemented in pvops, but has worked for a long time in classis/SuSE kernel
- Works for internal self NMI
- Only dom0 might receive a real hardware NMI forwarded
- Jan: Not a lot of testing of a high rate NMI (e.g. performance monitoring). Currently NMI is a rare event like a machine check.
